Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 12:36:26 +0100 From: Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@freebsd.org> To: Dmitry Chagin <dchagin@freebsd.org> Cc: "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org" <dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org>, "dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org" <dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: git: e013e36939ac - main - linux(4): Get rid of Linuxulator kernel build options. Message-ID: <4C0E8010-EFBF-42A5-90EF-A502E7BBD3D7@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <YNHC7bIN%2BtpRUm0C@heemeyer.club> References: <202106211656.15LGuXQU059224@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <C06B43AE-D887-410F-A212-5A16BC28DDB7@freebsd.org> <YNHC7bIN%2BtpRUm0C@heemeyer.club>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22 Jun 2021, at 12:01, Dmitry Chagin <dchagin@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 10:56:38PM +0100, Jessica Clarke wrote: >> On 21 Jun 2021, at 17:56, Dmitry Chagin <dchagin@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>>=20 >>> The branch main has been updated by dchagin: >>>=20 >>> URL: = https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3De013e36939ac87b53195370fb5e29f29= c1a4b5c6 >>>=20 >>> commit e013e36939ac87b53195370fb5e29f29c1a4b5c6 >>> Author: Dmitry Chagin <dchagin@FreeBSD.org> >>> AuthorDate: 2021-06-22 05:32:39 +0000 >>> Commit: Dmitry Chagin <dchagin@FreeBSD.org> >>> CommitDate: 2021-06-22 05:32:39 +0000 >>>=20 >>> linux(4): Get rid of Linuxulator kernel build options. >>>=20 >>> Stop confusing people, retire COMPAT_LINUX and COMPAT_LINUX32 = kernel >>> build options. Since we have 32 and 64 bit Linux emulators, we = can't build both >>> emulators together into the kernel. I don't think it matters, = Linux emulation >>> depends on loadable modules (via rc). >>>=20 >>> Cut LINPROCFS and LINSYSFS for consistency. >>=20 >> I don=E2=80=99t see why these two should be deleted? They currently = build fine, >> and GNU/kFreeBSD kernels enable them. They might work as modules, but = I >> would worry that too many parts of userland would try and read them >> before /etc/init.d/kldutils (the init script that loads modules) = loads >> them, so then we=E2=80=99d have to mess around with GRUB configs to = preload >> them. If the options work, please leave them in. >>=20 >=20 > both FS modules depend on linux.ko on i386 or linux_common.ko on = amd64, > so it doesn't make sense to have options for them But that still worked, and was even in NOTES so being tested by LINT. >> There=E2=80=99s a separate debate of whether this is the =E2=80=9Cright= =E2=80=9D fix for >> COMPAT_LINUX*; arguably that *should* work and it=E2=80=99s a bug = that they >> don=E2=80=99t, not a feature, even if it=E2=80=99s not of much = interest to support=E2=80=A6 >>=20 >> I=E2=80=99d like to see the second half reverted, please, and believe = the first >> should be too, but I feel less strongly about that. >>=20 >=20 > I think that descendants should adapt to upstream, esp since there is = no > KBI or ABI breakage. btw, debian wiki says gnu/kFreeBSD unmaintained > since 2014. That is the reason to worry about dead project? As the current maintainer this is news to me. I see no such comment on the port=E2=80=99s wiki page[1]. Jess [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C0E8010-EFBF-42A5-90EF-A502E7BBD3D7>