Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:24:04 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Excessive delays due to syncer kthread Message-ID: <20050227102404.GB96334@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20050227032829.GA75730@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050226071308.GN57256@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050226111418.62606C-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20050227032315.GA96334@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20050227032829.GA75730@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2005-Feb-26 19:28:29 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: >I don't think there are known problems with use of PREEMPTION on >RELENG_5. Thanks for that. How about RELENG_5_3? Do I need to move to -STABLE (and traditionally, this point of the release cycle is not a good time to be running -STABLE). -- Peter Jeremy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050227102404.GB96334>