Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:07:45 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, jhell <jhell@DataIX.net>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: zfs very poor performance compared to ufs due to lack of cache? Message-ID: <4C90A901.5000200@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <8E233260F0334BC58B2C07F383939F8E@multiplay.co.uk> References: <20100908084855.GF2465@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4C874F00.3050605@freebsd.org> <A6D7E134B24F42E395C30A375A6B50AF@multiplay.co.uk> <4C8D087B.5040404@freebsd.org> <03537796FAB54E02959E2D64FC83004F@multiplay.co.uk> <4C8D280F.3040803@freebsd.org> <3FBF66BF11AA4CBBA6124CA435A4A31B@multiplay.co.uk> <4C8E4212.30000@freebsd.org> <B98EBECBD399417CA5390C20627384B1@multiplay.co.uk> <D79F15FEB5794315BD8668E40B414BF0@multiplay.co.uk> <20100915104635.GA59871@icarus.home.lan> <8E233260F0334BC58B2C07F383939F8E@multiplay.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 15/09/2010 13:54 Steven Hartland said the following: > > Already running that as part of the patches unfortunately, it doesn't seem > to have any effect. Well, it does have an effect for me in strictly controlled micro-test. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C90A901.5000200>