Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 23:18:01 +0200 From: Marcin Cieslak <saper@system.pl> To: Bill Moran <wmoran@columbus.rr.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Solaris desktop and server differences Message-ID: <20000919231801.B75224@barbera.system.pl> In-Reply-To: <39BFA09B.49564234@columbus.rr.com>; from wmoran@columbus.rr.com on Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 11:43:23AM -0400 References: <LAW2-F218GtXsL1c00g0000cb0f@hotmail.com> <39BFA09B.49564234@columbus.rr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Moran (wmoran@columbus.rr.com) napisał(a):
> I wonder how Sun enforces their licensing?
They don't. I even managed to run Desktop version on
a multiprocessor machine (Server license is required to do that).
Another reason why we should not mess with FreeBSD - it's FREE
and we don't have to differentiate our market between those
who may want to pay more for essentialy the same product.
And hands off the installation procedure - I find
existing novice/express/custom model nearly ideal.
--
<< Marcin Cieslak // saper@system.pl >>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SYSTEM Internet Provider http://www.system.pl
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000919231801.B75224>