Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:36:53 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>, giffunip@tutopia.com, "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PHORONIX: OpenCL, GLSL Back-End For LLVM May Soon Open Up Message-ID: <20110830213653.GA37937@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <4E5D5489.4070408@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <1314733660.22981.YahooMailClassic@web113503.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E5D5489.4070408@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:22:17PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > On 08/30/11 21:47, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > > > >Christopher Bergstr?m and Pathscale delivered the EKOPath > >Compiler Suite, but no one followed up: > > > >(From the WantedPorts Wiki) > >https://github.com/pathscale/path64-suite > > > >There has been very low interest in the FreeBSD port, > >and unfortunately this is a bad signal that we give to > >companies that want to contribute :(. > > > >Pedro. I've tested pathf90 on FreeBSD 9.0. Once I got it built, I was underwhelmed by its performance. I also found that it could not read its own error message catalogues, which of course make an unpleasant programming experience. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110830213653.GA37937>