Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:33:32 +0000 From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> To: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> Cc: bf1783@gmail.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, bf1783@googlemail.com Subject: Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements Message-ID: <20101217143332.GB28086@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20101214093140.00007aad@unknown> References: <AANLkTin%2Bqr7Y-vMTbKg9ZKE6_zE%2BNVYFEMX%2BPwy4vbym@mail.gmail.com> <20101214093140.00007aad@unknown>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue Dec 14 10, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:47:39 +0000 > "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > The last part of your patch reverts a change that Warner Losh made in > > r212525 as part of his tbemd project merge. It's possible that this > > change may have been an unintended, but it followed a discussion in > > which Warner rejected a related patch proposed by Garrett Cooper, > > partly because sysinstall is included in build-tools in Makefile.inc1, > > even though some thought that it should not be. In any event, you > > should probably look into that before committing the last part of your > > patch. > > I'm wondering if people might be surprised to find sade gone if they > set WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL - one's an installer, the other a partitioning > program. that's a good argument. so WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL mustn't affect sade. cheers. alex > > -- > Bruce Cran -- a13x
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101217143332.GB28086>