Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 11:38:31 +0100 From: Marek Zarychta <zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> To: "Piotr P. Stefaniak" <pstef@freebsd.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: csh to sh migration for root in RELENG_14 Message-ID: <ZViUJwCxSdQEiwmh@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> In-Reply-To: <ZViHcns7wybF7k6R@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <6c6add3c-4a5e-4d84-9964-9a9448a36c95@sentex.net> <25943.49653.523313.53953@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <f2d13a52-528c-4224-822a-fa577661a204@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> <ZViHcns7wybF7k6R@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dnia Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 10:44:18AM +0100, Piotr P. Stefaniak napisaĆ(a): > On 2023-11-18 10:29:08, Marek Zarychta wrote: > > The change of root's shell from csh to sh was to attract a new > > generation of admins who were used to bash and similar shells. There is > > no turning back, no escape from this trend. We will probably also > > transit with $EDITOR from vi to ee in the future. > > I know you're trolling, but to make it clear: that was not the reason. > > Piotr In what way am I trolling? I have been a FreeBSD user for over 25 years. I had no insight and I don't know why the root shell was changed. The fact that tcsh is left in base is enough for me. Wait a few more years and you will see that the default editor will be changed too. The nano editor is copyleft licensed, in base we have ee, so this is a natural path. With kind regards -- Marek Zarychta
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ZViUJwCxSdQEiwmh>