Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:27:17 -0500 From: D J Hawkey Jr <hawkeyd@visi.com> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@freebsd.org> Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH: multiple vulnerabilities in the new PAM code Message-ID: <20030924142717.GA9026@sheol.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20030924142015.GC57288@madman.celabo.org> References: <3F705D4D.4070404@tenebras.com> <20030923205318.GB3346@scylla.towardex.com> <20030924091603.GC22622@starjuice.net> <20030924142015.GC57288@madman.celabo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 24, at 09:20 AM, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:16:03AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > On (2003/09/23 16:53), Haesu wrote:
> >
> > > Oh jee, here we go again. Hey, at least patched 3.5p1 on FreeBSD
> > > 4.8/4.9 are not effected :)
> >
> > Since -CURRENT's using a modified OpenSSH_3.6.1p1, I don't think this
> > issue affects FreeBSD at all.
>
> Unfortunately, it _does_ affect us. The PAM code in OpenSSH 3.7x was
> taken from FreeBSD's PAM code. des@ is working the issue now.
But just "portable", right? Or are any "core" OpenSSHes across various
FreeBSD releases also vulnerable?
Thanks,
Dave
--
______________________ ______________________
\__________________ \ D. J. HAWKEY JR. / __________________/
\________________/\ hawkeyd@visi.com /\________________/
http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030924142717.GA9026>