Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 03:00:34 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/cad/admesh Makefile Message-ID: <20110814030033.GA80255@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110813172040.GC38385@hades.panopticon> References: <201108020942.p729g1Ti068765@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110811180338.GB88978@hades.panopticon> <CADLo839VotWbi209%2BeR3LAuQ4HqC-LSGY4avcUFXHat=HjsrKg@mail.gmail.com> <20110812093328.GE85247@hades.panopticon> <b0535f6d53bb546b54d85797ec66cf0b@etoilebsd.net> <20110812101133.GF85247@hades.panopticon> <4E4584EA.7090306@FreeBSD.org> <20110813133717.GA38385@hades.panopticon> <4E469837.1030903@FreeBSD.org> <20110813172040.GC38385@hades.panopticon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:20:40PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * Matthias Andree (mandree@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > Possibly we should always mark ports for removal for three months after > > the point in time when the maintainer gets reset to ports@. > > Nice. Well that'll only result in two processes: more and more ports > will have maintainers reset and then removed, and remaining maintainers > will take more and more ports beyond their ability to maintain them, > both will lead to collapse. Is this also not undesirable? Big +1 for Dmitry here; ports@ is perfectly fine maintainer entity, much easier to work with, and often receives more and better care than many of seemingly "properly" maintained ports. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110814030033.GA80255>