Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:49:29 -0700 From: Mark Atkinson <atkin901@gmail.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9 IPv6 conformance test report Message-ID: <j89a6a$mgt$1@dough.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <CAGnGRdLrRukxJk2Jfhs37uGfM6X%2BfAoqtoSwBe9rsXLiSM=hSA@mail.gmail.com> References: <B143A8975061C446AD5E29742C531723163943@PWSVL-EXCMBX-01.internal.cacheflow.com> <CAGnGRdLrRukxJk2Jfhs37uGfM6X%2BfAoqtoSwBe9rsXLiSM=hSA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/2011 14:22, Qing Li wrote: > Since I have been receiving private reports on the test failures, I > thought I just post the test report as executed against the > upcoming FreeBSD 9.0 release in my own setup, so you can see where > the baseline is. > > More test reports will be posted here. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/ct-freebsd-9/ > > > I am going over each failure and providing the fix. > > Please let me know if you already have a suggested patch that you > are willing to share. Are the ct-2.1.1 suite results still a good baseline? From what I understand the v6 ready logo phase 2 tests are what people are comparing their compliance against currently. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6oLAkACgkQrDN5kXnx8ybkUACeIWdJfUHnMmLnipiJGN8eMqm8 MYEAnAuOIxwfi7ZeqYo40VHxN3b8NuNc =0n4k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?j89a6a$mgt$1>