Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 12:20:24 +0200 From: Timo Rossi <trossi@co.jyu.fi> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New approach to picobsd Message-ID: <20000124122024.A4574@horus.co.jyu.fi> In-Reply-To: <20000122145538.A390@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com>; from Greg Lehey on Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 02:55:38PM %2B0800 References: <3888D5CF.329989@achtung.com> <20000122145538.A390@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 02:55:38PM +0800, Greg Lehey wrote: > The real issue is: do we want a one-disk PicoBSD or a two-disk PicoBSD > (in fact, it's one-disk or multi-disk)? One disk is becoming What about embedded systems with small amounts of flash memory with hard disk emulation (for example an IDE-flashdisk with a few megabytes capacity)? Is PicoBSD the right choice to those situations at all? Or is it strictly for floppy-based systems? -- // Timo Rossi <trossi@co.jyu.fi>, <trossi@iki.fi> // To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000124122024.A4574>