Date: Thu, 23 Mar 1995 12:29:57 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@Glue.umd.edu> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>, bde@zeta.org.au, me@tartufo.pcs.dec.com, nate@trout.sri.mt.net, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Make World Times and a question about shared libs / make all Message-ID: <20081.795990597@freefall.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 23 Mar 95 12:26:50 EST." <Pine.SUN.3.91.950323122150.12200B-100000@cappuccino.eng.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I think you misunderstood (or I did you)... I'm speaking of folks who > would never consider making any part of the tree themselves, but just > would like to be able to do a little light level c hacking on their more > limited machine budgets. Jordan spoke of making /usr/include completely > links to parts of usr/src. I am wondering what effect that would have on > folks who don't even have a /usr/src. Will this mean that such folks > will have to carry around at least parts of the /usr/src tree, in order > to have the /usr/include [reasonably] complete? No. The installation would do a `make install shared=copies' so /usr/include would be ONLY files on a fresh from-bindist installation. This is the way it is now, in fact, or no one would be able to compile *anything* without a source dist! :-) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081.795990597>