Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:31:08 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik <mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: etcupdate tool in base? Message-ID: <4C114B8C.70407@intertainservices.com> In-Reply-To: <4C113342.7070804@icyb.net.ua> References: <201006101346.59824.jhb@freebsd.org> <AANLkTimSVUZjim-eraoJyZf-T982GceZjs7yV97qr8dd@mail.gmail.com> <4C113342.7070804@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/10/2010 2:47 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 10/06/2010 21:29 Eitan Adler said the following: > >> -1 unless mergemaster is replaced. > Have you tried etcupdate? > etcupdate and mergemaster have a similar function but do things in quite a > different way. While one is intended to be more interactive, the other is more > automated. They can not replace each other. > > -1 Also. How does this differ from a "mergemaster -iFU" ? That's pretty much as automated as it can get.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C114B8C.70407>