Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 May 2003 13:36:24 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
To:        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= <mbsd@pacbell.net>
Cc:        net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: A problem with too many network interfaces
Message-ID:  <200305271736.h4RHaOU7040015@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20030526135441.U326@atlas.home>
References:  <20030526010717.98E8391682@vineyard.net> <3ED1CB03.8010005@fsn.hu> <20030526135441.U326@atlas.home>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Mon, 26 May 2003 14:04:19 -0700 (PDT), =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= <mbsd@pacbell.net> said:

> A proper BSD port could use something like the trick in Stevens[1] and
> keep retrying the call with a larger bufer until the length of the
> result is the same as in the previous call.

Actually, a proper BSD port would use the net.route.iflist sysctl
instead.

-GAWollman



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305271736.h4RHaOU7040015>