Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:52:19 -0600 From: Jacques Vidrine <nectar@freebsd.org> To: Valentin Nechayev <netch@ivb.nn.kiev.ua> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Testers wanted: reentrant resolver Message-ID: <20040223165219.GB77099@madman.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <20040222080920.GA359@iv.nn.kiev.ua> References: <200402202346.i1KNkbkI013945@green.homeunix.org> <20040222080920.GA359@iv.nn.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[Resending: problems at mx1.freebsd.org rejected this message yesterday.] Valentin Nechayev said the following on 2/22/04 2:09 AM: > The main question: why do you do it this way instead of import of newer > ISC resolver which already has thread-safe resolver without any requirement > of TLS? Bringing in new resolver is still on the menu. Brian's work doesn't interfere. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040223165219.GB77099>