Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 18:20:40 +0100 From: Vincent Jardin <vjardin@free.fr> To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ng_nat vs natd vs ipnat? Message-ID: <200311141820.40593.vjardin@free.fr> In-Reply-To: <20031114163837.GA64140@saboteur.dek.spc.org> References: <20031114163837.GA64140@saboteur.dek.spc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry I did not. So maybe I should not answer. By the way, I think that a ng_nat would have quite the same perfomance than ipnat. Moreover I think that many ng_nat_xxx would be required in order to support the ALGs: - ng_nat_ftp - ng_nat_sip - ng_nat_h323 - ... ng_nat would be only the core of the NAT service. Vincent On Friday 14 November 2003 17:38, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > Has anyone implemented NAT as a Netgraph node? > If so, how does performance compare to natd and ipnat? > > Regards, > BMS > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311141820.40593.vjardin>