Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1998 13:42:52 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/unzip Makefile Message-ID: <9860.907533772@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 04 Oct 1998 13:35:20 PDT." <199810042035.NAA03592@mango.parc.xerox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In message <199810041031.DAA16004@freefall.freebsd.org>you write: > > Make this work on the ALPHA > > I must be missing something - who sets MACHINE_ARCH? (In the RELENG_2_2 > *.mk files, the answer is "nobody".) Do you mean something more like: Argh, sorry, this is a 3.0-ism. Hmmm. Help, Satoshi! Since your stuff is sort of weirdly "cross branch" here, what's the canonical way of dealing with architecture specific changes in the ports collection? I don't expect this to come up a lot since few ports are like unzip, one which actually comes with i386 assembly files that it tries to use in the "freebsd" target case (otherwise it uses C versions which work fine on the alpha), but for when it does we should probably have a policy. - Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9860.907533772>