Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 19:18:18 -0700 From: Paul Allen <nospam@ugcs.caltech.edu> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Data authentication for geli(8) committed to HEAD. Message-ID: <20060609021818.GH28128@groat.ugcs.caltech.edu> In-Reply-To: <4488CCC7.4040500@FreeBSD.org> References: <20060608132048.GD86198@garage.freebsd.pl> <20060608174113.GC1075@roadrunner.q.local> <4488CCC7.4040500@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
>From Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org>, Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 06:20:07PM -0700:
> 3. Implement some kind of sector-level journaling, again the performance
> is likely to suffer a great deal due to seeks.
Right. This is certainly a case where background fsck is useless and much of
the theory of softupdates generally is wrong.
Just one more nail to seal the fate of softupdates.
Paul
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060609021818.GH28128>