Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 19:18:18 -0700 From: Paul Allen <nospam@ugcs.caltech.edu> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Data authentication for geli(8) committed to HEAD. Message-ID: <20060609021818.GH28128@groat.ugcs.caltech.edu> In-Reply-To: <4488CCC7.4040500@FreeBSD.org> References: <20060608132048.GD86198@garage.freebsd.pl> <20060608174113.GC1075@roadrunner.q.local> <4488CCC7.4040500@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org>, Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 06:20:07PM -0700:
> 3. Implement some kind of sector-level journaling, again the performance
> is likely to suffer a great deal due to seeks.
Right. This is certainly a case where background fsck is useless and much of
the theory of softupdates generally is wrong.
Just one more nail to seal the fate of softupdates.
Paul
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060609021818.GH28128>