Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 15:24:24 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Lock of struct filedesc, file, pgrp, session and sigio Message-ID: <20010531152423.A59822@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010531134600.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Thu, May 31, 2001 at 01:46:00PM -0700 References: <20010531130155.A58258@dragon.nuxi.com> <XFMail.010531134600.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 01:46:00PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > It doesn't hurt to help distribute the load some, though. Requiring > each person who makes a change to compile it on every possible arch is > not something that will scale as more and more archs are added. If a > committer can get someone else to perform some of these test compiles > and fix any brokenness that > comes up I think that is adequate. Forgot to add, if others use the Alpha owners as simple test-compile resources, (1) the Alpha owners will not get any other work done, (2) will get quite tired of testing things that the patch author could easily test himself. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010531152423.A59822>