Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 10:47:01 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: "Christian S.J. Peron" <csjp@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 77201 for review Message-ID: <20050520104701.7658a5d5@mobile.pittgoth.com> In-Reply-To: <200505200017.j4K0HmZP080639@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200505200017.j4K0HmZP080639@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 20 May 2005 00:17:48 GMT "Christian S.J. Peron" <csjp@freebsd.org> wrote: > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=77201 > > Change 77201 by csjp@csjp_xor on 2005/05/20 00:17:30 > > > -replace a size_t for int in the checksum calculation routines > -declare temp variable to stuff the size of the extended attribute in. > We have to do this because for some reason the data type representing > extended attribute size between vn_extattr_get and VOP_GETEXTATTR conflict. > This makes the mac_chkexec build happy on AMD64 Requested by: trhodes Thanks!!! [SNIP] > return (error); > + /* XXX why are'nt extended attribute size specification types between > + * VOP_GETEXTATTR and vn_extattr_get the same? > + */ > + alen = ealen; > depends = malloc(alen + 1, M_CHKEXEC, M_WAITOK | M_ZERO); > error = vn_extattr_get(vp, IO_NODELOCKED, MAC_CHKEXEC_ATTRN, > MAC_CHKEXEC_DEP, &alen, depends, curthread); > Good question. -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050520104701.7658a5d5>