Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:32:33 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, rpaulo@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, bz@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, anchie@FreeBSD.org, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r211501 - in head/sys: modules modules/send netinet netinet6 sys Message-ID: <F198280F-6D5E-4620-9AB6-25E33FB6F726@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <4C718595.5050304@FreeBSD.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1008211534450.1942@qbhto.arg> <20100821.191255.1023414010414033264.imp@bsdimp.com> <4C717990.6020601@FreeBSD.org> <20100822.134229.550118873867470111.imp@bsdimp.com> <4C718595.5050304@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 22, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 08/22/2010 12:42, M. Warner Losh wrote: >=20 >> I think you're drawing the wrong conclusion here. >=20 > Doubtful. :) >=20 >> My point is that we have trusted folks in the past to do the right >> thing, even when they don't say they will. >=20 > And my point, which I will make one last time, is that this model = hasn't worked. Yes, it works sometimes, but we still have a bunch of = stuff that doesn't have _any_ man page at all. If we want to continue = the transition to being a more professional OS that isn't acceptable. >=20 > I've already made the points about why working through the = documentation _before_ committing is valuable, and that the simple step = of requiring this is an easy way to make sure the problem we have = doesn't get any worse. Clearly there isn't a lot of sympathy for either = of these perspectives in the wider community, so c'est la vie. >=20 > But I was serious about my other comment, if you(pl.) are not willing = to make a change to improve the situation, you lose the right to = complain down the road when the man pages don't magically appear. >=20 >> towards Ann >=20 > Wrong name. :) >=20 Doug, you're being a grade-A asshole in this entire discussion. The = merits of your argument are being completely overshadowed by your = patronizing attitude and over the top straw-man extremism. Ana deserves = an apology from you, and you would do well to consider apologizing to = everyone involved. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F198280F-6D5E-4620-9AB6-25E33FB6F726>