Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:27:34 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r202628 - in head: . sys/amd64/amd64 sys/i386/i386 sys/i386/xen sys/sys Message-ID: <02BD244A-E287-46E0-B6A4-B6643CA7BA2E@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <20100119155920.GU64905@hoeg.nl> References: <201001191531.o0JFVI6n029716@svn.freebsd.org> <9FF943CE-9FCB-48C8-A048-23F23620F4E5@samsco.org> <20100119155920.GU64905@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 19, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hi Scott, > > * Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> wrote: >> Ok, so you've broken a legitimate piece of compatibility. What's the >> gain? > > That we no longer have a blend of GNU and ISO C inline throughout our > entire source tree, making the code more accessible for alternative > compilers. > Which compilers? Is this a requirement for CLANG? Or is it just a nice-to-have clean-up? Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?02BD244A-E287-46E0-B6A4-B6643CA7BA2E>