Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:08:56 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org>, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl>, =?UTF-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=c3=b8r?= =?UTF-8?Q?grav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH HPN Message-ID: <564224A8.6030507@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <1447171330.3672217.435085401.40D8E7F2@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> <5641BFC4.7050208@digiware.nl> <86a8qm9l9b.fsf@desk.des.no> <5641D00E.501@digiware.nl> <86611a9kj6.fsf@desk.des.no> <5641D419.5090103@digiware.nl> <1447171330.3672217.435085401.40D8E7F2@webmail.messagingengine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Felder wrote on 11/10/2015 17:02: [...] >> But like I said: The code I found at openssh was so totally different >> that I did not continued this track, but chose to start running openssh >> from ports. Which does not generate warnings I have questions about the >> originating ip-nr. >> >>>> Are they still willing to accept changes to the old version that is >>>> currently in base? >>> >>> No, why would they do that? >> >> Exactly my question.... >> I guess I misinterpreted your suggestion on upstreaming patches. >> >> --WjW >> > > I honestly think everyone would be better served by porting blacklistd > from NetBSD than trying to increase verbosity for log files. I didn't know blacklistd. It seems very interesting. It would be nice if somebody will port it to FreeBSD. Miroslav Lachman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?564224A8.6030507>