Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:27:38 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unsigned wchar_t Message-ID: <20110327202738.GB30694@britannica.bec.de> In-Reply-To: <20110328083657.35507caf@fubar.geek.nz> References: <20110328083657.35507caf@fubar.geek.nz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:36:57AM +1300, Andrew Turner wrote: > Hello hackers@ > > I'm working on getting FreeBSD working with the ARM EABI. As part of > this the Procedure Call Standard for the ARM Architecture (AAPCS) > defines wchar_t as an unsigned int. Does someone at ARM actually get paid to define ABIs that are different from what everyone else is doing? Didn't we learn anything from the problems of char vs signed char vs unsigned char? Joerg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110327202738.GB30694>