Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:46:50 +0000 From: Nik Clayton <nik@FreeBSD.org> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 5-Stable Roadmap and the docs Message-ID: <20030221204650.GP6403@clan.nothing-going-on.org> In-Reply-To: <20030221163750.GA25075@submonkey.net> References: <20030221163750.GA25075@submonkey.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 04:37:50PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > Since at the moment RELENG_4 and CURRENT have some disparities, I think we > have three options: > > i) Branch the doc/ tree; > > ii) Abandon the "doc/ reflects life with -stable" approach; > > iii) Muddle through adding <note>s, etc and get ourselves in a state. > > Which one should we be going for ? (i) is likely to be a pain to manage. I don't think (ii) is realistic, given that we're not suggesting that people migrate en masse to 5.0 yet. Which leaves (iii)... > Also, I think now is a good time to kill all 2.x and 3.x stuff from > the docs. I could be convinced that 3.x should stay - I'm unshakeable > on 2.x, but that doesn't mean I'm about to barge ahead and do it. 2.x can go. I wouldn't personally lose sleep if we removed information that was solely pertinent to 3.x either. N -- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.freebsd.org/ (__) FreeBSD Documentation Project http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/ \\\'',) \/ \ ^ --- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F 94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 --- .\._/_) [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+VpA5k6gHZCw343URAsKSAKCLwuJ/vikbhu3ZQFk1iyMI9VtO+wCeL96s 2QzTG+bL6+Ql+Ak0uvwmC8U= =B+6e -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030221204650.GP6403>