Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 12:19:34 -0700 (PDT) From: "Aron T. Roberts" <aroberts@WOLFENET.com> To: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" <michaelv@MindBender.serv.net> Cc: Thomas Arnold <tom@inna.net>, Doug Russell <drussell@saturn-tech.com>, Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>, Stephen Roome <steve@visint.co.uk>, Dave Alderman <dave@persprog.com>, hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Pentuim or Pentuim Pro ? Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.95.970416121159.2259A-100000@gonzo.wolfenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199704161749.KAA07608@MindBender.serv.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 16 Apr 1997, Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com wrote: > > I don't know what benchmark you're using, but if you send it to me I > can benchmark it on my Pentium Pro 200MHz (actually overclocked to > 233, so that might be cheating :-), running NetBSD 1.2. I also have a > Cyrix 6x86 P166+, and can use a Pentium 133. All are running NetBSD > 1.2. actaully I am not "using" any benchmark at the moment.. I have a pile of parts and hopefully a spare few hours to do this. I'm asking folks to let me know what benchmarks people want to see.. If there is no interest I'll probably just run the usual stuff for my own benefit. However if some folks are evaluating a purchase and have some specific benchmarks they want to see.. send 'em my way... no promises but I'll do my best. aron
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.3.95.970416121159.2259A-100000>