Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 14:23:11 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <jeff-ml@mountin.net> Cc: Jamie Norwood <mistwolf@mushhaven.net>, Oleg Ogurok <oleg@ogurok.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: which branch? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003161422400.92566-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.20000316151715.00b7f4f0@207.227.119.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
> Not to start a big discussion on the release process (again), but for the
> QA team's sake there should be a day or 3 delay between the release tag and
> the grand send off to allow time for 11th hour problems. The few more
> problematic I saw were fixed. A minor ones remain, but need to rule out
> hardware/pilot error and none should be show stoppers for anyone.
This is exactly what happened ;-)
> For those with non-critical needs I heartily recommend 4.0 release or
> stable. Much, much better than 3.0R's debut.
Agreed.
Kris
----
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0003161422400.92566-100000>