Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 6 Jul 1997 16:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
To:        nsayer@quack.kfu.com
Cc:        Bill Fenner <fenner@FreeBSD.ORG>, joerg@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: kern/3446
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.95.970706163918.2904A-100000@current1.whistle.com>
In-Reply-To: <199707062239.PAA26655@quack.kfu.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Sun, 6 Jul 1997 nsayer@quack.kfu.com wrote:

> Bill Fenner writes:
> 
> > Synopsis: IPFIREWALL reject returns port unreachable, not host
> 
> > State-Changed-Why: 
> > Turns out this is yet another duplicate, for kern/3452.
> > I missed that one because it's closed.
> 
> I must protest in the strongest possible terms the closure without
> action of this PR.
There was action 
the entire IPFW code has been changed so that
you may now select the way in which you reject  a packet..
please check out the new version of ipfw in both 2.2 and 3.0

let me know it this does not solve the problem for you.

julian




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970706163918.2904A-100000>