Date: Sun, 6 Jul 1997 16:41:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: nsayer@quack.kfu.com Cc: Bill Fenner <fenner@FreeBSD.ORG>, joerg@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/3446 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970706163918.2904A-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199707062239.PAA26655@quack.kfu.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sun, 6 Jul 1997 nsayer@quack.kfu.com wrote: > Bill Fenner writes: > > > Synopsis: IPFIREWALL reject returns port unreachable, not host > > > State-Changed-Why: > > Turns out this is yet another duplicate, for kern/3452. > > I missed that one because it's closed. > > I must protest in the strongest possible terms the closure without > action of this PR. There was action the entire IPFW code has been changed so that you may now select the way in which you reject a packet.. please check out the new version of ipfw in both 2.2 and 3.0 let me know it this does not solve the problem for you. julianhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970706163918.2904A-100000>