Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 19:32:58 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@flat.berklix.net> To: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> Cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: src-4 Message-ID: <200702031832.l13IWw8R096457@fire.jhs.private> In-Reply-To: <20070203174535.GA68904@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <45C35E40.8090009@math.missouri.edu> <200702031652.l13GqNdZ094789@fire.jhs.private> <20070203174535.GA68904@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> RELENG_4 branch. Now, while I wouldn't rule out the occasional stray > commit, I would say that RELENG_4 is pretty much dead. The aggregate of stray commits to RELENG_4 will do no good to ctm users if ctm-4 is not there, just CVSup users will benefit. BSD gets business credibility by stability & not rushing to judgement. Individuals who do not want ctm-src-4 should unsubscribe it, but not attempt to deny ctm-src-4 to others. When diminishing src-4 list no longer warrants Stephen's space & bandwidth he'll know & tell us. -- Julian Stacey. BSD Unix C Net Consultancy, Munich/Muenchen http://berklix.com Mail Ascii, not HTML. Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz. Vista of a Bill from Redmond ? http://berklix.com/free-talk-on-free-software/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200702031832.l13IWw8R096457>