Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:45:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0406281043320.43751-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20040628.095605.13314562.imp@bsdimp.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
To some extent it can be said that Poul-Henning's proceedure worked.. It must be admitted that: "supported" -> "HEADSUP" -> objections -> "supported" is a legitimate and correct outcome, and certainly one of the reasons that we do the "HEADSUP" part in the first place :-) On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <40DF2607.5020409@mac.com> > Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> writes: > : In other words, I care quite a bit about how "working, supported > : functionality" gets transitioned to "no longer available". I'm not happy with > : the notion of "supported" -> "HEADS UP" -> one week -> gone. > > It appears that this is widely used enough that it won't be removed. > I agree that this is a too streamlined path. > > Warner > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0406281043320.43751-100000>