Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 14:18:25 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon <roman@harmonic.co.il> To: Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparz@cs.iastate.edu> Cc: Doug Barton <DougB@gorean.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Load averages Message-ID: <969970705.39d094111339d@webmail.harmonic.co.il> In-Reply-To: <20000925203603.A10466@buchanan-181-249.stures.iastate> References: <20000925183854.A10200@buchanan-181-249.stures.iastate> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009251650450.10846-100000@dt051n37.san.rr.com> <20000925203603.A10466@buchanan-181-249.stures.iastate>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparz@cs.iastate.edu>: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:52:07PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > > > Yup. There are some issues with load average in -current right now > > related to the SMPng code that produce the same symptoms, which is why > I > > mentioned it. So now the question is, what do tools like top, ps, > systat, > > etc. say? > > top actually said a lot... It turned out that iplog was consuming 98% > of processor's time. Another question is: why? Anyway, I killed it and > restarted it again and it runs fine now. > I don't know why I didn't see it before... > If it happends again you can bug the MAINTAINER... It's probably a bug in the iplog rather than in FreeBSD. --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?969970705.39d094111339d>