Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 11:59:52 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Eirik =?ISO-8859-1?B?2A==?=verby <ltning@anduin.net> Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Current status of nullfs and/or unionfs? Message-ID: <20050505115903.K42300@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <BE9FD8F8.149B1%ltning@anduin.net> References: <BE9FD8F8.149B1%ltning@anduin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Eirik [ISO-8859-1] Øverby wrote: > The solution, or at least parts of it, would be to have certain parts of > the jail filesystems mounted in via nullfs (acceptable solution) or > unionfs (ideal solution). However, ever since FreeBSD 4.10 this has been > a major problem, as both filesystems started exhibiting major stability > and data integrity issues. I'm running 4.11 with ~90 mount/jails running on two of our servers ... haven't noticed any stability problems ... what are you seeing? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050505115903.K42300>