Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:09:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org> To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.include.dist src/lib Makefile src/lib/libisc Makefile src/share/mk bsd.libnames.mk Message-ID: <200010242109.e9OL9BO14261@curve.dellroad.org> In-Reply-To: <20001024134442.A19193@dragon.nuxi.com> "from David O'Brien at Oct 24, 2000 01:44:42 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien writes: > > Build the ISC library as libisc. This library comes as part of the > > bind distribution, but until now was not being built as a separate > > entity. For documentation, see these man pages: > > Do we want to install the headers into /usr/include/isc/ vs. > /usr/include/ ? Does anyone else do that? It seemed to me that preserving the "isc/" part was a good idea to avoid namespace collision, because the header files have rather generic names like "tree.h" and "heap.h". But it doesn't really matter to me much. > Do we want a seperate lib, or just fold them into libc or one of our > other existing libs? If people start using these routines a lot, that might be a good idea. In other words, I'm happy with anything as long as it's all in there somewhere :-) -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Packet Design, Inc. * http://www.packetdesign.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010242109.e9OL9BO14261>