Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:15:39 -0600 From: John <strgout@unixjunkie.com> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: interface bonding Message-ID: <20031230201538.GA78996@mail.unixjunkie.com> In-Reply-To: <20031222201341.GA98235@FreeBSD.org.ua> References: <20031222184812.87890.qmail@web60808.mail.yahoo.com> <20031222201341.GA98235@FreeBSD.org.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:13:41PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:48:12AM -0800, Richard Bejtlich wrote: > > Thanks to Dmitry's tip on ng_eiface, I'm happy to > > report using the following configuration to bond > > interfaces with ng_one2many and a virtual interface > > ngeth0. > > > > sf2 and sf3 are real interfaces connected to my 10/100 > > tap. > > -- > > kldload ng_ether > > kldload ng_one2many > > ifconfig sf2 promisc -arp up > > ifconfig sf3 promisc -arp up > > ngctl mkpeer . eiface hook ether > > ngctl mkpeer ngeth0: one2many lower one > > ngctl connect sf2: ngeth0:lower lower many0 > > ngctl connect sf3: ngeth0:lower lower many1 > > ifconfig ngeth0 -arp up > > -- > > > > It works: > > > You can also try to dispense with ng_ether(4) completely > by attaching the "ether" hook of the eiface node to the > one2many's "one" hook directly. > > > Cheers, > -- > Ruslan Ermilov > FreeBSD committer > ru@FreeBSD.org Sorry netgraph is a little over my head on config, can you show an example?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031230201538.GA78996>