Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:56:28 -0600 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reattach/redetect allways connected umass device - is it possible ? Message-ID: <20050324195628.GC10908@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <42431806.3060302@elischer.org> References: <1110800717.1296.19.camel@localhost> <200503231411.46948.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20050323154642.J37251@sasami.jurai.net> <42421D8D.5060502@elischer.org> <20050323205841.N37251@sasami.jurai.net> <77e48641fc04164b4c81cce75c42a38b@FreeBSD.org> <42431806.3060302@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Mar 24), Julian Elischer said: > John Baldwin wrote: > >On Mar 23, 2005, at 9:00 PM, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > >>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Julian Elischer wrote: > >>>eject should imply a detach.. > >>>i.e. I think your patch should call the detach code from the eject > >>>code. > >> > >>Eject is for devices that support removable media. > > that doesn't mean that an eject shouldn't do all teh work for a > detach as well. I would be extremely surprised if a "camcontrol eject cd0" removed /dev/cd0 :) Eject is for devices whose media can be removed, but the device itself stays. Or are you just saying detach should do an eject (possibly a stop also) first? -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050324195628.GC10908>