Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:59:14 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.cc> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step5, pam_opie OPIE auth fix for review Message-ID: <20020121145914.A91420@hellblazer.nectar.cc> In-Reply-To: <3C4C7EA7.66CBFC0D@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:48:39PM -0800 References: <20020120233050.GA26913@nagual.pp.ru> <200201202344.g0KNijt34738@grimreaper.grondar.org> <3C4BC6A0.4078CBA6@mindspring.com> <20020121140516.GB57549@madman.nectar.cc> <3C4C7EA7.66CBFC0D@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:48:39PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > "Jacques A. Vidrine" wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:43:28PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > Once you guys have this all hammered out, are you going to > > > integrate PAM and Kerberos? 8-) 8-) 8-). > > > > In what way do you mean? > > In the way that the author of the PAM architecture from Sun > spoke at the Silicon Valley BSD User's Group meeting, Do you have a reference, or do we have to guess what you are talking about? :-) > and > there are just some things that can't be wedged into the > PAM framework until the framework is changed. That is certainly true. It's also true if s/PAM/foo/ for most values of foo. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine <n@nectar.cc> http://www.nectar.cc/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020121145914.A91420>