Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 22:07:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike Jakubik" <mikej@rogers.com> To: "Joshua Coombs" <jcoombs@gwi.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0-RC1 available Message-ID: <1422.FgtQRFVGBkU=.1129082866.squirrel@172.16.0.1> In-Reply-To: <digtbv$9jk$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <434BCDF6.3090303@samsco.org> <digpfu$r1b$1@sea.gmane.org> <434BEC96.4050801@samsco.org> <digtbv$9jk$1@sea.gmane.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, October 11, 2005 1:39 pm, Joshua Coombs wrote: > > "Scott Long" <scottl@samsco.org> wrote in message > news:434BEC96.4050801@samsco.org... > >> Joshua Coombs wrote: >> >> >>> Given that we're in the RC stage, is it too late to get a PR >>> stuffed in to correct ntpd/ntpdate behavior in /etc/rc.d? >>> >>> Joshua Coombs >>> >>> >> >> Depends on the kind of problem that you are seeing. Any details? >> >> >> Scott >> > > Two issues I spotted. > > > First, ntpdate is still being used, despite it being marked as > depreciated for quite some time. The preferred replacement is to call ntpd > with the -q switch. This causes ntpd to match ntpdate's behavior, it sets I like my ntpdate command, and im not about to change all my scripts and configure some ntpd servers just to quickly sync the time.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1422.FgtQRFVGBkU=.1129082866.squirrel>