Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 04:30:17 -0800 (PST) From: "J.D." <jimd@siu.edu> To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/48311: compile of librsvg2 fails with "bad" c++ code Message-ID: <200302161230.h1GCUHft020255@freefall.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
The following reply was made to PR ports/48311; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "J.D." <jimd@siu.edu>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, jimd@siu.edu
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/48311: compile of librsvg2 fails with "bad" c++ code
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 05:09:38 +0000
I found the solution to my problem: not replacing libart_lpgl, but
removing libart, which strangely enough provides "libart_lgpl.so.5"
whereas /usr/ports/graphics/libart_lpgl2 provides "libart_lgpl_2.so.5".
I was "removing" 'libart_lgpl2" ('libart_lgpl_2') as its port and
directory name was inherently related to in the suggested resolution of
removing "the old libart_lgpl", but unknowingly leaving "libart"
('libart_lgpl') in place.
Deleting the "libart-2.3.3" port took care of librsvg2's compile
problems, so this PR can be closed.
HOWEVER, I would like to suggest that "libart" (2.3.3) be renamed to
"libart_lgpl" so it will conform to the name of the libary it installs,
and would indicate a older version of "libart_lgpl_2". There would be
less, possibly, confusion over the NAME of the port/package and the NAME
of the libraries/files installed, and it would be easier to
differentiate between it and the "libart_lgpl2" port/package.
Thank you.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302161230.h1GCUHft020255>