Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:45:22 +0900
From:      Yoshihiro Koya <Yoshihiro.Koya@math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp>
To:        kris@obsecurity.org
Cc:        Yoshihiro.Koya@math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: CPUTYPE flag of 4.3-BETA
Message-ID:  <20010321054522A.ipfw@ya3.so-net.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20010320121726.B23970@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <20010321050330K.koya@pluto.math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp> <20010320121726.B23970@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for your immediate reply.

From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: CPUTYPE flag of 4.3-BETA
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:17:26 -0800
Message-ID: <20010320121726.B23970@xor.obsecurity.org>

> On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 05:03:30AM +0900, Yoshihiro Koya wrote:
> 
> > Is it correct behavior of the standard make world/buildkernel on 4.3-BETA?
> > Or, does something go wrong?
> 
> CPUTYPE isn't currently used for building the kernel on 4.x.  I've
> patched it to do so on -current, but haven't merged the changes.

I can understand that CPUTYPE isn't used for building
the kernel on 4-stable. Thanks.

But, I have still a question.
The compilation of the kernel itself is free from the effects of 
CPUTYPE, but the kernel modules may be compiled with -march=SOMECPU
as I repoted in my previous message. 
It seems to cause some inconsistency in the future, I guess.
Is my thought wrong?

koya

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010321054522A.ipfw>