Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 17:33:11 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?UTF-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?=) Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile Makefile.inc1 Message-ID: <20070516173311.6efe4f6a@deskjail> In-Reply-To: <867ir8kidz.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200705160846.l4G8kaYr074481@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070516124002.6g6ox6y28048ws4g@webmail.leidinger.net> <867ir8kidz.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav) (Wed, 16 May 2007 15:28:08 +0=
200):
> Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> writes:
> > For the check-old target there's no reason to split up the targets, as
> > you can list them unconditionally. For developing convenience I did
> > chose to have the check-old-XXX targets in Makefile.inc1 ("make -f
> > Makefile.inc1 TARGET" works just fine). I see no need to expose all
> > targets.
>=20
> I see no reason not to. The fact that they were not all exposed has
> always confused me, I don't know how many times I've done 'make
> check-old-libs' and been annoyed that it didn't work.
Not all targets in Makefile.inc1 are exposed, so why not make them all
available...
Bye,
Alexander.
--=20
Hold the MAYO & pass the COSMIC AWARENESS ...
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070516173311.6efe4f6a>