Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:19:03 +0200
From:      Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net>
To:        Brandon Allbery <allbery.b@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg>
Subject:   Re: [HEADSUP] pkg(8) is now the only package management tool
Message-ID:  <54072357.40101@sorbs.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAKFCL4Wbg-DUZoZrrbZS-stKD8x4U%2BO5KowMHDGxFWSr3qLdGA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20140901195520.GB77917@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54050D07.4010404@sorbs.net> <CAOFF%2BZ1MOr9-rYbwHYWqBKjMvRPwUnew4jThEoJ_WkoTmwyNsQ@mail.gmail.com> <540522A3.9050506@sorbs.net> <54052891.5000104@my.hennepintech.edu> <54052DFA.4030808@freebsd.org> <54053372.6020009@my.hennepintech.edu> <5405890F.8080804@freebsd.org> <CAF-3MvNBWSEWF-HarwF0xcXQgo=7-dO%2BtvLMO1maELPY0RVhQQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140902125256.Horde.uv31ztwymThxUZ-OYPQoBw1@webmail.df.eu> <5405AE54.60809@sorbs.net> <1D2B4A91-E76C-43A0-BE75-D926357EF1AF@gmail.com> <5405E4F5.4090902@sorbs.net> <5406BD65.705@digsys.bg> <5406ED34.7090301@sorbs.net> <5406F00C.6090504@digsys.bg> <C4EC1A3A-6EB1-4EE1-ACEA-12C8E203991C@cs.huji.ac.il> <358B9E99-5E02-47BA-9E30-045986150966@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <540711FF.3050409@sorbs.net> <47F4AAAA-2D88-4F03-8602-880C4B129305@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <54072011.7030800@sorbs.net> <CAKFCL4Wbg-DUZoZrrbZS-stKD8x4U%2BO5KowMHDGxFWSr3qLdGA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net>
> wrote:
>
>   
>> I think portsnap should provide 'stable' - tested, known
>> working, security patched
>>
>>     
>
> But the ports tree does not provide this and never has. 
Yes and with the exception of 6.x->7.x no one has come alone and made
such a massive change that has deliberately broken build systems for
production servers without good reason without any alternative whilst
people migrate (and lets not start the 'well you had 2 years' thing
again - I had less than 2 months notice that the EOL message was put
there so that the packaging system (and therefore the ports tree) was
going to be deliberately, irrevocably and irreversibly broken - and the
person responsible was quite happy about it. )
> You want a
> package-based distribution.
>
>   
I built my own because the defaults don't work for me.  Now I don't have
anything... and if I had been using packages the same person behind this
change would have completely screwed all my production servers on the
patching for (amongst other things) heartbleed when they decided to
change the default for apache 2.2 to apache 2.4 without having
mod_perl24 available first.

-- 
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54072357.40101>