Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:15:17 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: olli@lurza.secnetix.de Subject: Re: absolute vs. relative offsets in disklabel Message-ID: <20060804131517.4b43311c@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <200608031248.k73CmOws037728@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <20060802192507.GB1136@roadrunner.aventurien.local> <200608031248.k73CmOws037728@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> (Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:48:24 +0200 (CEST)): > But then again, harddisks tend to get bigger, so there is > probably not much need for a shrinkfs tool. Sometimes it's not an availability decision... think about EMC, disk pools and changing requirements in an environment where the decision makers know enough to use their desktop system. Bye, Alexander. -- "Maybe you can't understand this, but I finally found what I need to be happy, and it's not friends, it's things." -Fry http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060804131517.4b43311c>