Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:23:12 +0300
From:      Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
To:        Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@gmail.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
Subject:   Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
Message-ID:  <4E5DB730.3070908@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE-mSOLu-ZkKGw6f01T1NDHTmeVDaAXmicrDzaEaqXdyg7ggCg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com> <201108300929.51810.hselasky@c2i.net> <4E5CA9BE.2020005@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <CAE-mSOLu-ZkKGw6f01T1NDHTmeVDaAXmicrDzaEaqXdyg7ggCg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
30.08.2011 12:23, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> [Taking random email.]
>
> I think we could merge the $subj web page with this one (which is
> more actual, as of 7.0): http://www.freebsd.org/features.html
>

The pages serve different purposes. There's no point in elaborating 
about feature X if feature X support doesn't differ from other OS 
implementation. And we should focus on major differences, not just any 
other feature.

Despite we are a company of enthusiasts most enthusiasts once in a 
lifetime come to the problem of explaining why this OS is better than 
other or why we shouldn't count on FreeBSD yet.

-- 
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E5DB730.3070908>