Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:12:01 +0100 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linuxolator: proc/filesystems implementation Message-ID: <20061214151201.GB27798@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0612140401h7bf0bdb0idb1590120ae95e3f@mail.gmail.com> References: <790a9fff0612140401h7bf0bdb0idb1590120ae95e3f@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 06:01:27AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote: > Linux has a file in the procfs that shows all the loaded filesystem modules. > > I have implemented the function that fills this file using the linprocfs > module. thnx for the work but does this help anything? I cannot imagine that linux software that expects (lets say) "fat32" module can be able to cope with "msdosfs". you can either implement a translation table or forget it :) why did you chose to implement this? any particular case where it helps? roman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061214151201.GB27798>