Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:55:21 -0700
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To:        Rich Wales <richw@webcom.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 4.1-STABLE kernel with 4.1-RELEASE userland?
Message-ID:  <20000823095521.A13699@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
In-Reply-To: <200008231415723.richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu>; from richw@webcom.com on Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 08:27:59AM -0700
References:  <200008231415723.richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 08:27:59AM -0700, Rich Wales wrote:
> Does this sound like expected behavior?  I would have thought that
> a 4.1-STABLE kernel (and modules) would still be compatible with the
> 4.1-RELEASE userland binaries; is this not the case?  Did I do some-
> thing obviously wrong here?

It's not exactly expected behavior, but you are in an unsupported
configuration.  It's expected that thing's won't work right with an out
of sync userland and kernel.  Sometimes you get luckey and sometimes you
don't.

-- Brooks

-- 
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000823095521.A13699>