Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 16:14:16 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, George Neville-Neil <gnn@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] projects/ipsec Message-ID: <7d2366eb-caca-e9b1-174c-3b7cde96e45f@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <DAA420E7-5E09-4A98-91D4-E09C13310233@FreeBSD.org> References: <2bd32791-944f-2417-41e9-e0fe1c705502@FreeBSD.org> <a607059a-97c9-e36e-0269-bfc7d4f11eb9@FreeBSD.org> <DAA420E7-5E09-4A98-91D4-E09C13310233@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09.01.2017 14:38, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On 27 Dec 2016, at 10:18, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > >> So, if there will no objection, I'll merge projects/ipsec into head/ >> within two weeks. > > I still keep seeing almost daily changes to the branch and am having a > hard time to convince myself to do a proper review that way. I would > very much prefer this to be (a) either become stable first and then give > people a chance, or (b) see if you can break out small self-contained > changes put them up into review and merge them piece by piece making it > a lot easier to convince ourselves that things still look good. Hi, yes, I hope I have fixed all found issues, now I will test the changes in our environment. I prefer the first way (a), because another splitting into small pieces requires a lot of time that I don't have. So, if you want to do a review, you are welcome :) Now I'll be focused on testing with different IKEd, documenting the changes, and fixing possible NO_INET/NO_INET6 related build issues. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7d2366eb-caca-e9b1-174c-3b7cde96e45f>