Date: 17 Nov 1999 14:37:26 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd inetd.c Message-ID: <xzpogct1bop.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Andre Albsmeier's message of "Wed, 17 Nov 1999 14:26:42 %2B0100" References: <199911170332.TAA55014@freefall.freebsd.org> <19991117142642.A52979@internal>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de> writes: > What do people think about bringing the whole -current's inetd into > -stable? I have done this on all of my 20 machines (mainly for the > internal identd suppert) and I didn't experience any problems... I'm seriously considering doing just that. I too have run -CURRENT's inetd on -STABLE machines (production systems, even) with no perceptible problems. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpogct1bop.fsf>