Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 07:44:45 -0700 (MST) From: Diana Eichert <deichert@wrench.com> To: Tony <missing@nts.umd.edu> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OT: ciscoworks Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10203060736010.6191-100000@inago.swcp.com> In-Reply-To: <20020305225450.A84866-100000@nts.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Tony wrote: > > Sorry for the off topic post but I can't think of a better group to ask. > I'd like to have feedback from folks at any level on how they feel about the > product. I've got my own feelings but I'd like to hear what others think. > Feel free to reply off list if you like. > > Thanks, > Tony Link > nts.umd.edu/~missing/pgp > NTS/OIT/UMD Hmmm, well if you're in a Cisco heterogeneous world, with LOTS of network devices to manage it's a good tool. If you only have 6-12 network devices to manage I can think of several open source tools that will do the job. The only real high point I see with it is it gives us a layer2 view of our switched ethernet/atm network. Oh yeah, did I mention that it really helps to be in a Cisco heterogeneous world? One of my big griefs with it is I can't get to the data that is stored in it's database. Cisco doesn't want you to get to that data except via it's web interface. diana eichert by day an enterprise management analyst at a large US gov't research facility by night a softball/soccer/volleyball nerd To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10203060736010.6191-100000>