Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:39:55 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk> To: Alban Hertroys <dalroi@solfertje.student.utwente.nl> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "hackmiester \(Hunter Fuller\)" <hackmiester@hackmiester.com> Subject: Re[2]: arrrrgh! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's gmirror code?! Message-ID: <1678007122.20060917113955@rulez.sk> In-Reply-To: <0AE8B3AB-1709-4724-94C8-D25558B27EFF@solfertje.student.utwente.nl> References: <20060909173813.GA1388@FS.denninger.net> <45065C67.6040503@cs.tu-berlin.de> <C9F971C5-50FE-4BF0-9975-83E8072E6C3F@hackmiester.com> <4509A7ED.4090701@cs.tu-berlin.de> <E1887D8A-0799-489A-87D1-1304D0D05F2D@hackmiester.com> <0AE8B3AB-1709-4724-94C8-D25558B27EFF@solfertje.student.utwente.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Alban, Friday, September 15, 2006, 9:44:07 AM, you wrote: > On Sep 15, 2006, at 24:34, hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) wrote: >>>> Hahahahaha... That's ironic... >>> >>> That wasn't meant to be ironic. Years of experience and >>> observations of development lead to this conclusion. >> >> RIght. All i can say, though, is that someone that doesn't know any >> better would probably not think "Oh! That means that upgrades are >> possible between releases, and not that my system will actually >> run, or anything!" >> It just seems it'd be quite a cause of confusion. > So, actually Microsoft may be correctly claiming that WindowsXP is > more stable than Linux. That it spontaneously reboots as soon as I > bore it isn't related at all... Your Windows must be really badly broken, because my Windows XP spontaneously rebooted only once in those many years I have been using it. In my opinion, XP is pretty decent system. -- Best regards, Daniel mailto:danger@rulez.sk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1678007122.20060917113955>