Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:45:54 +0930 From: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> To: Ernst de Haan <znerd@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, absinthe@pobox.com, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Please review: new Java Project docs Message-ID: <20020820134553.A733@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <200208191731.08310.znerd@FreeBSD.org>; from znerd@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:31:08PM %2B0200 References: <200208170958.14422.absinthe@pobox.com> <200208191300.54857.znerd@FreeBSD.org> <15713.3405.773127.501053@emerger.yogotech.com> <200208191731.08310.znerd@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:31:08PM +0200, Ernst de Haan wrote: > On Monday 19 August 2002 17:22, Nate Williams wrote: > > > 5) 2.1.3.3 Will the JDK 1.1 port really be removed? I don't think so, > > > since it is really used quite a lot still... Nate? > > > > I had no plans on removing it, since it's smaller and lighter than the > > 1.2+ stuff. > > And it's still used in the field. So I agree with Nate; it really should not > be removed from the ports collection. Its also a dependency for 1.2.2, so you'd invalidate two JDKs at once ;). -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020820134553.A733>